Saturday 16 November 2019

Jarvis Golf Company sells a special putter for $20 each. In March, it sold 28,000 putters while manufacturing 30,000. There was no beginning inventory on March 1. Production information for March was:


1)        Jarvis Golf Company sells a special putter for $20 each. In March, it sold 28,000 putters while manufacturing 30,000. There was no beginning inventory on March 1. Production information for March was:

Direct  manufacturing labor per unit                   15 minutes

Fixed selling and administrative costs
$ 40,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead
132,000
Direct materials cost per unit
2
Direct manufacturing labor per hour
24
Variable manufacturing overhead per unit
4
Variable selling expenses per unit
2
Required:

a.         Compute the cost per unit under both absorption and variable costing.
b.        Compute the ending inventories under both absorption and variable costing.
c.         Compute operating income under both absorption and variable costing.

Answer:

a.                                                                                                                                                                                         Absorption         Variable

Direct  manufacturing labor ($24/4)                     $   6.00            $ 6.00
Direct   materials                                                       2.00                 2.00
Variable  manufacturing  overhead                           4.00                 4.00
Fixed manufacturing overhead  ($132,000/30,000)    4.40                    0

Total  cost per unit                                               $16.40             $12.00

b.                                                                                                                                                                                        Absorption         Variable

Beginning   inventory                                                  $0                    $0


Cost of goods manufactured:
30,000  ×  $16.40                                        $492,000
30,000 × $12.00


$360,000


Cost of goods available  for sale                      $492,000         $360,000

Cost of goods sold:
28,000  ×  $16.40                                        $459,200
28,000  ×  $12.00                                                               $336,000

Ending   inventory                                                    $   32,800        $ 24,000

c.        Absorption-costing income statement:

Sales  (28,000 × $20)                                                               $560,000
Cost of goods sold (28,000  × $16.40)                                       459,200

Gross   margin                                                                             100,800
Less:
Variable  selling and administrative            $56,000
Fixed  selling and administrative                   40,000             96,000

Operating   income                                                                       $ 4,800

Variable-costing income statement:

Sales  (28,000 × $20)                                                               $560,000

Variable COGS (28,000 × $12)
$336,000

Variable selling expenses (28,000 × $2)
56,000
392,000
Contribution margin Fixed costs:
Manufacturing


$132,000
168,000
Selling and administrative
40,000
172,000
Operating income

$ (4,000)

Diff: 2
Terms: variable costing, absorption costing Objective: 2
AACSB:  Analytical skills

2)       Johnson Realty bought a 2,000-acre island for $10,000,000 and divided it into 200 equal size lots. As the lots are sold, they are cleared at an average cost of $5,000.
Storm drains and driveways are installed at an average cost of $8,000 per site. Sales commissions are 10% of selling price.
Administrative costs are $850,000 per year.
The average selling price was $160,000 per lot during 20X5 when 50 lots were sold.

During 20X6, the company bought another 2,000-acre island and developed it exactly the same way. Lot sales in 20X6 totaled 300 with an average selling price of $160,000. All costs were the same as in 20X5.

Required:

Prepare income statements for both years using both absorption and variable costing methods.

Answer: Cost per site:

Absorption

Variable
Land cost $10,000,000/200 sites
$50,000
$0
Clearing costs
5,000
5,000
Improvements
8,000
8,000
Total
$63,000
$13,000
Absorption-costing income statements:
20X5
20X6
Sales
Cost of goods sold:
50 × ($50,000 + $8,000 + $5,000)
$8,000,000

3,150,000
$48,000,000
300 × ($50,000 + $8,000 + $5,000)
                
18,900,000
Gross margin
$4,850,000
$29,100,000
Variable marketing
800,000
4,800,000
Fixed administrative
850,000
850,000
Operating income
$3,200,000
$23,450,000
Variable-costing income statements:
20X5
20X6
Sales
Variable expenses: Cost of operations:
$8,000,000
$48,000,000

50 × $13,000
300 × $13,000
650,000

3,900,000
Selling expenses
800,000
4,800,000
Contribution margin Fixed expenses:
Land
$6,550,000

10,000,000
$39,300,000

10,000,000
Administrative
850,000
850,000
Operating income Diff: 3
$(4,300,000)
$28,450,000
Terms: variable costing, absorption costing Objective: 2
AACSB:  Analytical skills

3)        Kaiser Company just hired its fourth production manager in three years. All three previous managers had quit because they could not get the company above the break-even point, even though sales had increased somewhat each year. The company was operating at about 60 % of plant capacity. The flatware industry was growing, so increased sales were not out of the question.

I. R. Thinking took the job as manager of the production division with a very attractive salary package. After interviewing for the position, he proposed a salary and bonus package that would give him a very small salary but a large bonus if he took the operating income (using absorption costing) above the breakeven point during his very first year.

Required:

What do you think Mr. Thinking had in mind for increasing the company's operating income? Answer: Mr. Thinking realized that he could probably increase both production and sales during the coming year. If he substantially overproduced he knew that the extra costs would be hidden in unsold
inventory. If the new production level could be sold by the sales force in the growing market, the profits would increase anyway and everybody would be happy.

Also, he could combine increased production with reduced fixed manufacturing costs such as maintenance. In the short run, several combinations could be undertaken by Mr. Thinking to ensure that the profit picture would improve.
Diff: 3
Terms: absorption costing Objective: 3
AACSB:  Ethical reasoning

4)        Explain three methods under absorption costing that managers can use to improve operating income. Answer: 1) A plant manager may switch to manufacturing products that absorb the highest amount of fixed manufacturing costs, regardless of the demand for the product.

2)   A plant manager may accept a particular order to increase production, even though another plant in the same company may be better suited to handle the order.

3)   To increase production, a manager may defer maintenance beyond the current period. Diff: 3
Terms: absorption costing Objective: 3
AACSB:  Reflective thinking

No comments:

Post a Comment